Notebook Computers Gateway M465BIOS DownloadsDescriptionFile InfoSupports: Windows Vista (32-bit), Windows XPNote: This is BIOS version 71.12 for Windows Vista or Windows XP and the Gateway notebook computer models listed below.4/4/2007 2,458 KBSupports: Windows Vista (32-bit)Note: This is an updated WinPhlash1656.exe file. WinPhlash is BIOS update utility that flashes the BIOS on the motherboard.3/30/2007 1,119 KBSupports: Windows Vista (32-bit)Note: This is BIOS version 71.10 for the Gateway notebook computer models and components listed below.2/2/2007 3,009 KBSupports: Windows XPNote: This is BIOS version 71.08.01 for Gateway M465, NX510S, NX560, S-7510N, MX69XX Series, or MX6750 Series notebook computers. 3,709 KBSupports: Windows XPNote: This is BIOS version 71.07 for the Gateway notebook computer models listed below.8/24/2006 3,531 KBSupports: Windows XPNote: This is BIOS version 71.05 for Gateway M465 notebook computers.5/25/2006 3,507 KBHard Drive DownloadsDescriptionFile InfoSupports: Windows Vista (64-bit), Windows Vista (32-bit), Windows XPNote: This file contains the Windows XP or Windows Vista (32-bit or 64-bit) SATA/mass storage controller driver for the computer models and components listed below. English, Japanese, and Spanish installation instructions are included in the file.1/23/2007 18,502 KBSupports: Windows XPNote: This is the SATA hard drive driver for the Gateway notebook computer models listed below.
This driver is needed during installation of a non-Gateway supplied operating system. English, Spanish, and Japanese instructions are included in this file.1/30/2006 18,103 KBMedia Reader DownloadDescriptionFile InfoSupports: Windows Vista (64-bit), Windows Vista (32-bit), Windows XPNote: This file contains the Windows XP and Windows Vista (32-bit and 64-bit) Media Card Reader driver for the computer models and components listed below.4/24/2007 4,998 KBModem DownloadsDescriptionFile InfoSupports: Windows Vista (32-bit)Note: This file contains the Windows Vista (32-bit or 64-bit) modem driver for the computer models and components listed below.
.Keystroke logging, often referred to as keylogging or keyboard capturing, is the action of recording (logging) the keys struck on a, typically covertly, so that person using the keyboard is unaware that their actions are being monitored. Data can then be retrieved by the person operating the logging program. A keylogger can be either or.While the programs themselves are legal, with many of them being designed to allow employers to oversee the use of their computers, keyloggers are most often used for stealing and other confidential information.Keylogging can also be used to study human-computer interaction. Numerous keylogging methods exist: they range from hardware and software-based approaches to analysis.
A from a software-based keylogger, based on the screen capture above.Software-based keyloggers are computer programs designed to work on the target computer's. Keyloggers are used in organizations to troubleshoot technical problems with computers and business networks.
Families and business people use keyloggers legally to monitor network usage without their users' direct knowledge. Even publicly admitted that operation system has a built-in keylogger in its final version “to improve typing and writing services”. However, malicious individuals can use keyloggers on public computers to steal passwords or credit card information. Most keyloggers are not stopped by encryption because that only protects between computers, thus the threat being from the user's computer.From a technical perspective, there are several categories:.
Hypervisor-based: The keylogger can theoretically reside in a running underneath the operating system, which thus remains untouched. It effectively becomes a. Is a conceptual example.based: A program on the machine obtains to hide in the OS and intercepts keystrokes that pass through the kernel. This method is difficult both to write and to combat. Such keyloggers reside at the, which makes them difficult to detect, especially for user-mode applications that don't have root access.
They are frequently implemented as that subvert the operating system kernel to gain unauthorized access to the hardware. This makes them very powerful. A keylogger using this method can act as a keyboard, for example, and thus gain access to any information typed on the keyboard as it goes to the operating system. API-based: These keyloggers keyboard inside a running application.
The keylogger registers keystroke events as if it was a normal piece of the application instead of malware. The keylogger receives an event each time the user presses or releases a key. The keylogger simply records it. Windows APIs such as GetAsyncKeyState, GetForegroundWindow, etc. Are used to poll the state of the keyboard or to subscribe to keyboard events. A more recent example simply polls the for pre-boot authentication that have not been cleared from memory.
Form grabbing based: -based keyloggers log submissions by recording the web browsing on submit events. This happens when the user completes a form and submits it, usually by clicking a button or hitting enter. This type of keylogger records forms data before it is passed over the Internet. Javascript-based: A malicious script tag is injected into a targeted web page, and listens for key events such as onKeyUp. Scripts can be injected via a variety of methods, including, or a compromise of the remote web site.
Memory-injection-based: Memory Injection -based keyloggers perform their logging function by altering the memory tables associated with the browser and other system functions. By patching the memory tables or injecting directly into memory, this technique can be used by malware authors to bypass Windows UAC (User Account Control). The and trojans use this method exclusively.
Non-Windows systems have protection mechanisms that allow access to locally recorded data from a remote location. Remote communication may be achieved when one of these methods is used:.
Data is uploaded to a website, database or an server. Data is periodically emailed to a pre-defined. Data is transmitted employing an attached hardware system. The software enables a remote login to the local machine from the Internet or the local network, for data logs stored on the target machine.Keystroke logging in writing process research Keystroke logging is now an established research method for the study of writing processes. Different programs have been developed to collect online process data of writing activities, including, Scriptlog, and Translog.Keystroke logging is legitimately used as a suitable research instrument in several writing contexts. These include studies on cognitive writing processes, which include.
descriptions of writing strategies; the writing development of children (with and without writing difficulties),. spelling,. first and second language writing, and.
specialist skill areas such as translation and subtitling.Keystroke logging can be used to research writing, specifically. It can also be integrated into educational domains for second language learning, programming skills, and typing skills.Related features Software keyloggers may be augmented with features that capture user information without relying on keyboard key presses as the sole input. Some of these features include:. Clipboard logging. Anything that has been copied to the can be captured by the program. Screen logging. Are taken to capture graphics-based information.
Applications with screen logging abilities may take screenshots of the whole screen, of just one application, or even just around the mouse cursor. They may take these screenshots periodically or in response to user behaviors (for example, when a user clicks the mouse). A practical application that is used by some keyloggers with this screen logging ability, is to take small screenshots around where a mouse has just clicked; thus defeating web-based keyboards (for example, the web-based screen keyboards that are often used by banks), and any web-based on-screen keyboard without screenshot protection.
Programmatically capturing the text in a. The allows programs to request the text 'value' in some controls. This means that some passwords may be captured, even if they are hidden behind password masks (usually asterisks). The recording of every program/folder/window opened including a screenshot of every website visited. The recording of, conversations, FTP downloads and other Internet-based activities (including the bandwidth used).Hardware-based keyloggers. Main article:Hardware-based keyloggers do not depend upon any software being installed as they exist at a hardware level in a computer system. Firmware-based: -level that handles keyboard events can be modified to record these events as they are processed.
Gateway Profile 5 Drivers Audio During Austin Marathon
Physical and/or is required to the machine, and the software loaded into the BIOS needs to be created for the specific hardware that it will be running on. Keyboard hardware: Hardware keyloggers are used for keystroke logging utilizing a hardware circuit that is attached somewhere in between the and the computer, typically inline with the keyboard's cable connector. There are also connectors based Hardware keyloggers as well as ones for Laptop computers (the Mini-PCI card plugs into the expansion slot of a laptop). More stealthy implementations can be installed or built into standard keyboards so that no device is visible on the external cable. Both types log all keyboard activity to their, which can be subsequently accessed, for example, by typing in a secret key sequence. A hardware keylogger has an advantage over a software solution: it is not dependent on being installed on the target computer's operating system and therefore will not interfere with any program running on the target machine or be detected by any.
However, its physical presence may be detected if, for example, it is installed outside the case as an inline device between the computer and the keyboard. Some of these implementations can be controlled and monitored remotely using a wireless communication standard.
Wireless keyboard and mouse sniffers: These passive sniffers collect packets of data being transferred from a wireless keyboard and its receiver. As encryption may be used to secure the wireless communications between the two devices, this may need to be cracked beforehand if the transmissions are to be read. In some cases, this enables an attacker to type arbitrary commands into a victim’s computer. Keyboard overlays: Criminals have been known to use keyboard overlays on to capture people's PINs. Each keypress is registered by the keyboard of the ATM as well as the criminal's keypad that is placed over it. The device is designed to look like an integrated part of the machine so that bank customers are unaware of its presence.
Acoustic keyloggers: can be used to monitor the sound created by someone typing on a computer. Each key on the keyboard makes a subtly different acoustic signature when struck. It is then possible to identify which keystroke signature relates to which keyboard character via such as.
Free download 3gp hindi movies. The repetition frequency of similar acoustic keystroke signatures, the timings between different keyboard strokes and other context information such as the probable language in which the user is writing are used in this analysis to map sounds to letters. A fairly long recording (1000 or more keystrokes) is required so that a big enough is collected.
Electromagnetic emissions: It is possible to capture the of a wired keyboard from up to 20 metres (66 ft) away, without being physically wired to it. In 2009, Swiss researchers tested 11 different, and laptop keyboards in a semi- and found them all vulnerable, primarily because of the prohibitive cost of adding during manufacture. The researchers used a wide-band to tune into the specific frequency of the emissions radiated from the keyboards. Optical surveillance: Optical surveillance, while not a keylogger in the classical sense, is nonetheless an approach that can be used to capture passwords or PINs. A strategically placed camera, such as a hidden at an, can allow a criminal to watch a PIN or password being entered.
Physical evidence: For a keypad that is used only to enter a security code, the keys which are in actual use will have evidence of use from many fingerprints. A passcode of four digits, if the four digits in question are known, is reduced from 10,000 possibilities to just 24 possibilities (10 4 versus 4! These could then be used on separate occasions for a manual 'brute force attack'. Smartphone sensors: Researchers have demonstrated that it is possible to capture the keystrokes of nearby computer keyboards using only the commodity found in smartphones.
The attack is made possible by placing a smartphone near a keyboard on the same desk. The smartphone's accelerometer can then detect the vibrations created by typing on the keyboard and then translate this raw accelerometer signal into readable sentences with as much as 80 percent accuracy. The technique involves working through probability by detecting pairs of keystrokes, rather than individual keys.
It models 'keyboard events' in pairs and then works out whether the pair of keys pressed is on the left or the right side of the keyboard and whether they are close together or far apart on the QWERTY keyboard. Once it has worked this out, it compares the results to a preloaded dictionary where each word has been broken down in the same way. Similar techniques have also been shown to be effective at capturing keystrokes on touchscreen keyboards while in some cases, in combination with or with the ambient-light sensor. Body keyloggers: Body keyloggers tracks and analyze body movements to determine which keys were stroke. The attacker needs to be familiar with the keys layout of the tracked keyboard to correlate between body movements and keys position.
Tracking audible signals of the user' interface (e.g. A sound the device produce to informs the user that a keystroke was logged) may reduce the complexity of the body keylogging algorithms, as it marks the moment at which a key was pressed.History In the mid-1970s, the developed and deployed a hardware keylogger targeting.
Termed the 'selectric bug', it measured the movements of the print head of IBM Selectric typewriters via subtle influences on the regional magnetic field caused by the rotation and movements of the print head. An early keylogger was written by and posted to the Usenet newsgroup net.unix-wizards, net.sources on November 17, 1983. The posting seems to be a motivating factor in restricting access to /dev/kmem on systems. The program operated by locating and dumping character lists (clients) as they were assembled in the Unix kernel.In the 1970s, spies installed keystroke loggers in the US Embassy and Consulate buildings in.They installed the bugs in II and Selectric III electric typewriters.Soviet embassies used manual typewriters, rather than electric typewriters, for —apparently because they are immune to such bugs.As of 2013, Russian special services still use typewriters. Cracking Writing simple software applications for keylogging can be trivial, and like any nefarious computer program, can be distributed as a or as part of a.
What is not trivial for an attacker, however, is installing a covert keystroke logger without getting caught and downloading data that has been logged without being traced. An attacker that manually connects to a host machine to download logged keystrokes risks being traced. A trojan that sends keylogged data to a fixed e-mail address or risks exposing the attacker.Trojans Researchers devised several methods for solving this problem.
They presented a deniable password snatching attack in which the keystroke logging trojan is installed using a virus or worm. An attacker who is caught with the virus or worm can claim to be a victim. The asymmetrically encrypts the pilfered login/password pairs using the of the trojan author and covertly broadcasts the resulting.
They mentioned that the ciphertext can be encoded and posted to a public bulletin board such as. Use by police In 2000, the used FlashCrest iSpy to obtain the of, son of mob boss.Also in 2000, the FBI lured two suspected Russian cybercriminals to the US in an elaborate ruse, and captured their usernames and passwords with a keylogger that was covertly installed on a machine that they used to access their computers in. The FBI then used these credentials to hack into the suspects' computers in Russia to obtain evidence to prosecute them. Countermeasures The effectiveness of countermeasures varies because keyloggers use a variety of techniques to capture data and the countermeasure needs to be effective against the particular data capture technique.
In the case of Windows 10 keylogging from Microsoft it is enough to change some privacy settings on your computer. For example, an on-screen keyboard will be effective against hardware keyloggers, transparency will defeat some—but not all—screen loggers and an application that can only disable hook-based keyloggers will be ineffective against kernel-based keyloggers.Also, keylogger program authors may be able to update the code to adapt to countermeasures that may have proven to be effective against them.Anti-keyloggers. Main article:An is a piece of specifically designed to detect keyloggers on a computer, typically comparing all files in the computer against a database of keyloggers looking for similarities which might signal the presence of a hidden keylogger.
As anti-keyloggers have been designed specifically to detect keyloggers, they have the potential to be more effective than conventional antivirus software; some antivirus software do not consider keyloggers to be malware, as under some circumstances a keylogger can be considered a legitimate piece of software. Live CD/USB Rebooting the computer using a or write-protected is a possible countermeasure against software keyloggers if the CD is clean of malware and the operating system contained on it is secured and fully patched so that it cannot be infected as soon as it is started. Booting a different operating system does not impact the use of a hardware or BIOS based keylogger.Anti-spyware / Anti-virus programs Many applications can detect some software based keyloggers and quarantine, disable or cleanse them.
However, because many keylogging programs are legitimate pieces of software under some circumstances, anti-spyware often neglects to label keylogging programs as spyware or a virus. These applications can detect software-based keyloggers based on patterns in, and keylogger behaviors (such as the use of and certain ).No software-based anti-spyware application can be 100% effective against all keyloggers. Also, software-based anti-spyware cannot defeat non-software keyloggers (for example, hardware keyloggers attached to keyboards will always receive keystrokes before any software-based anti-spyware application).However, the particular technique that the anti-spyware application uses will influence its potential effectiveness against software keyloggers. As a general rule, anti-spyware applications with will defeat keyloggers with lower privileges. For example, a hook-based anti-spyware application cannot defeat a kernel-based keylogger (as the keylogger will receive the keystroke messages before the anti-spyware application), but it could potentially defeat hook- and API-based keyloggers.Network monitors (also known as reverse-firewalls) can be used to alert the user whenever an application attempts to make a network connection. This gives the user the chance to prevent the keylogger from ' with his or her typed information.Automatic form filler programs.
Main article:Automatic form-filling programs may prevent keylogging by removing the requirement for a user to type personal details and passwords using the keyboard. Microsoft office 2000 developer iso. Are primarily designed for to fill in checkout pages and log users into their accounts. Once the user's account and information has been entered into the program, it will be automatically entered into forms without ever using the keyboard or, thereby reducing the possibility that private data is being recorded. However, someone with physical access to the machine may still be able to install software that can intercept this information elsewhere in the operating system or while in transit on the network.
( (TLS) reduces the risk that data in transit may be intercepted by and.)One-time passwords (OTP) Using may be keylogger-safe, as each password is invalidated as soon as it is used. This solution may be useful for someone using a public computer. However, an attacker who has remote control over such a computer can simply wait for the victim to enter his/her credentials before performing unauthorized transactions on their behalf while their session is active.Security tokens Use of or other may improve security against in the face of a successful keylogging attack, as accessing protected information would require both the (hardware) security token as well as the appropriate password/passphrase. Knowing the keystrokes, mouse actions, display, clipboard, etc. Used on one computer will not subsequently help an attacker gain access to the protected resource.
Some security tokens work as a type of hardware-assisted one-time password system, and others implement a cryptographic, which can improve security in a manner conceptually similar to one time passwords. And their associated keypads for entry may be vulnerable to keystroke logging through a so-called where an attacker substitutes the card reader/PIN entry hardware for one which records the user's PIN.On-screen keyboards Most on-screen keyboards (such as the on-screen keyboard that comes with ) send normal keyboard event messages to the external target program to type text. Software key loggers can log these typed characters sent from one program to another.Additionally, keylogging software can take screenshots of what is displayed on the screen (periodically, and/or upon each mouse click), which means that although certainly a useful security measure, an on-screen keyboard will not protect from all keyloggers. Keystroke interference software Keystroke interference software is also available.These programs attempt to trick keyloggers by introducing random keystrokes, although this simply results in the keylogger recording more information than it needs to.
An attacker has the task of extracting the keystrokes of interest—the security of this mechanism, specifically how well it stands up to, is unclear.Speech recognition Similar to on-screen keyboards, software can also be used against keyloggers, since there are no typing or mouse movements involved. The weakest point of using voice-recognition software may be how the software sends the recognized text to target software after the recognition took place.Handwriting recognition and mouse gestures Also, many and lately can already convert pen (also called stylus) movements on their to computer understandable text successfully. Use this principle by using mouse movements instead of a stylus. Mouse gesture programs convert these strokes to user-definable actions, such as typing text. Similarly, and can be used to input these gestures, however, these are less common every day.The same potential weakness of speech recognition applies to this technique as well.Macro expanders/recorders With the help of many programs, a seemingly meaningless text can be expanded to a meaningful text and most of the time context-sensitively, e.g. 'en.wikipedia.org' can be expanded when a web browser window has the focus. The biggest weakness of this technique is that these programs send their keystrokes directly to the target program.
However, this can be overcome by using, i.e. Sending mouse clicks to non-responsive areas of the target program, sending meaningless keys, sending another mouse click to the target area (e.g. Password field) and switching back-and-forth.Deceptive typing Alternating between typing the login credentials and typing characters somewhere else in the focus window can cause a keylogger to record more information than they need to, although this could easily be filtered out by an attacker. Similarly, a user can move their cursor using the mouse during typing, causing the logged keystrokes to be in the wrong order e.g., by typing a password beginning with the last letter and then using the mouse to move the cursor for each subsequent letter. Lastly, someone can also use to remove, parts of the typed text without using the keyboard. An attacker who can capture only parts of a password will have a larger to attack if he chose to execute a.Another very similar technique uses the fact that any selected text portion is replaced by the next key typed.
E.g., if the password is 'secret', one could type 's', then some dummy keys 'asdf'. Then, these dummies could be selected with the mouse, and the next character from the password 'e' is typed, which replaces the dummies 'asdf'.These techniques assume incorrectly that keystroke logging software cannot directly monitor the clipboard, the selected text in a form, or take a screenshot every time a keystroke or mouse click occurs. They may, however, be effective against some hardware keyloggers.See also.References., keylogger.org. Oxford dictionaries., Secure List, 'Today, keyloggers are mainly used to steal user data relating to various online payment systems, and virus writers are constantly writing new keylogger Trojans for this very purpose.'
PC Tools. Caleb Chen (2017-03-20). (PDF). 2005-11-26: 23–24. Retrieved 2011-03-25.
Cite journal requires journal=. Jonathan Brossard (2008-09-03). Archived from (PDF) on 2008-09-13. Retrieved 2008-09-23. Cite journal requires journal= ; External link in publisher=. Threatpost The first stop for security news.
Retrieved 2017-01-24. Krebs on Security. Retrieved 26 April 2011. K.P.H. Sullivan & E. Good sleep hygiene pdf.
Lindgren (Eds., 2006), Studies in Writing: Vol. Computer Key-Stroke Logging and Writing: Methods and Applications.
Oxford: Elsevier. V. Berninger (Ed., 2012), Past, present, and future contributions of cognitive writing research to cognitive psychology.
New York/Sussex: Taylor & Francis. Vincentas (11 July 2013). Spyware Loop. Archived from on 7 December 2013. Retrieved 27 July 2013. Italic or bold markup not allowed in: newspaper=. Microsoft.
Retrieved 2009-07-15. Digital Society. Archived from on 26 August 2009. Retrieved 9 June 2011. SpyReveal Anti Keylogger. Archived from on 29 April 2011.
Retrieved 25 April 2011. SpyReveal Anti Keylogger.
Retrieved 26 February 2016. Jeremy Kirk (2008-12-16). News Service. Retrieved 2009-04-19. Andrew Kelly (2010-09-10). (PDF). Sarah Young (14 September 2005).
UC Berkeley NewsCenter. Knight, Will. ZDNet. Martin Vuagnoux and Sylvain Pasini (2009-06-01). Vuagnoux, Martin; Pasini, Sylvain (eds.).
Proceedings of the 18Th Usenix Security Symposium. Retrieved 2009-04-19. External link in publisher=. Maggi, Federico; Volpatto, Alberto; Gasparini, Simone; Boracchi, Giacomo; Zanero, Stefano (2011). 7th International Conference on Information Assurance and Security. IEEE.
Marquardt, Philip; Verma, Arunabh; Carter, Henry; Traynor, Patrick (2011). (sp)iPhone: decoding vibrations from nearby keyboards using mobile phone accelerometers. Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Computer and communications security. 19 October 2011. Retrieved August 25, 2014.
Gateway Audio Driver Windows 10
Owusu, Emmanuel; Han, Jun; Das, Sauvik; Perrig, Adrian; Zhang, Joy (2012). ACCessory: password inference using accelerometers on smartphones. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications. ACM. Aviv, Adam J.; Sapp, Benjamin; Blaze, Matt; Smith, Jonathan M. Practicality of accelerometer side channels on smartphones.
Proceedings of the 28th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference. ACM. Cai, Liang; Chen, Hao (2011). Proceedings of the 6th USENIX conference on Hot topics in security. Retrieved 25 August 2014. Xu, Zhi; Bai, Kun; Zhu, Sencun (2012).
TapLogger: inferring user inputs on smartphone touchscreens using on-board motion sensors. Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Security and Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks. Pp. 113–124. Miluzzo, Emiliano; Varshavsky, Alexander; Balakrishnan, Suhrid; Choudhury, Romit Roy (2012). Tapprints: your finger taps have fingerprints. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services. Pp. 323–336.
Spreitzer, Raphael (2014). PIN Skimming: Exploiting the Ambient-Light Sensor in Mobile Devices. Proceedings of the 4th ACM Workshop on Security and Privacy in Smartphones & Mobile Devices.
Pp. 51–62.:. Hameiri, Paz (2019). Hakin9 IT Security Magazine. 14 (07): 79–94.
Retrieved 2009-11-22. Archived from on 2013-12-20. Retrieved 2013-12-20. ^Geoffrey Ingersoll.2013. ^Sharon A. Maneki.2012. Agence France-Presse, Associated Press.
Inquirer.net.Anna Arutunyan.2013-12-21 at the. Young, Adam; Yung, Moti (1997). Deniable Password Snatching: On the Possibility of Evasive Electronic Espionage.
Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. Pp. 224–235. Young, Adam; Yung, Moti (1996). Cryptovirology: extortion-based security threats and countermeasures. Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy.
Pp. 129–140. John Leyden (2000-12-06). The Register.
Retrieved 2009-04-19. John Leyden (2002-08-16). The Register. Alex Stim (2015-10-28). 23 August 2018. Austin Modine (2008-10-10). The Register.
Retrieved 2009-04-18. Scott Dunn (2009-09-10). Windows Secrets.
Retrieved 2014-05-10. Christopher Ciabarra (2009-06-10). Archived from on 2010-06-26. Cormac Herley and Dinei Florencio (2006-02-06). Retrieved 2008-09-23.External links Wikimedia Commons has media related to.
at.
Comments are closed.
|
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |